Skip to main content

The contested record

Where the published record does not agree

Across the corpus, 9 measured objects carry figures that do not reconcile. We print 19 published values from 15 publishers, exactly as each published them, and reconcile none of them.

A disagreement on this page is not a defect in our reading — it is the state of the public record. Where sources conflict, choosing one silently would be the error; so both stand, dated and attributed, and the judgement is left to you.

9
Open disagreements
19
Values printed
6
Dossiers affected
15
Publishers named

Three kinds of disagreement

  • Two publishers, two values

    4

  • One publisher, revised

    2

  • Different objects counted

    3

The record, dossier by dossier

Not a research lab: what Mistral AI’s own listings say about getting hired there

  • Two publishers, two values

    Bruyères-le-Châtel datacentre, accelerator count

    What is counted: The number of accelerators reported for the same Essonne site.

    • 18,000

      InsideHPC

      March 2025 reporting.

      Citation 14

    • 13,800

      CRN

      2026 reporting.

      Citation 13

    Why it stays open: The counts are a year apart and neither states its scope, so the later one is not evidence that the earlier one was wrong.

    Both values are printed. Neither publisher reconciles with the other, and we do not convert, split or average them.

    No value is averaged.
  • Two publishers, two values

    Bruyères-le-Châtel datacentre, electrical capacity

    What is counted: The capacity published for the Essonne compute site developed with Eclairion.

    • 40 MW

      DEPLOY datacentre registry

      Facility registry entry.

      Citation 15

    • 44 MW

      Scrutica

      Observer report on the same site.

      Citation 16

    Why it stays open: Neither source states whether it measures contracted, installed or design capacity, so the two cannot be judged against each other.

    Both values are printed. Neither publisher reconciles with the other, and we do not convert, split or average them.

    No value is averaged.
  • Two publishers, two values

    Mistral AI, Series B valuation

    What is counted: The valuation attached to the €600m round announced on 11 June 2024.

    • $6bn

      CNBC

      Reported 11 June 2024, in US dollars.

      Citation 6

    • €5.8bn

      Bloomberg

      Reported the same day, in euros.

      Citation 7

    Why it stays open: Neither publisher states the rate it used, and neither figure is the other converted at the rates of that day.

    Both values are printed. Neither publisher reconciles with the other, and we do not convert, split or average them.

    No value is averaged.

One fab, two sizes, two aid figures: the Crolles 300 mm capital record read against itself

  • Different objects counted

    Crolles joint fab, French public aid

    What is counted: The public money attached to the Crolles project, at two different stages of the same decision.

    • €7.4 billion

      Agence Europe

      Aid envelope cleared by the Commission, April 2023.

      Citation 7

    • €2.9 billion

      Reuters

      Aid contracted by the French state, June 2023.

      Citation 8

    Why it stays open: An authorised ceiling and a signed contract are different objects; reading the smaller number as a cut, or the larger as money paid, would both be wrong.

    The values count different objects or periods, so no range, sum or growth rate is derived across them.

    No value is averaged.
  • Two publishers, two values

    Crolles joint fab, project size

    What is counted: The headline size published for the ST–GlobalFoundries 300 mm project.

    • US$5.7 billion

      Reuters

      Memorandum of understanding, 11 July 2022.

      Citation 2

    • €7.5 billion

      eeNews Europe

      Finalised agreement, 5 June 2023.

      Citation 3

    Why it stays open: Neither figure is a conversion of the other at the rates of its date, and no publisher reconciles the two.

    Both values are printed. Neither publisher reconciles with the other, and we do not convert, split or average them.

    No value is averaged.

The dependency nobody procured: what Europe can actually document about Anthropic

  • Different objects counted

    Anthropic, published headcount

    What is counted: Headcounts published for one counterparty, with no company disclosure in the record we opened.

    • Nearly 200

      Tech.eu

      Europe only, 7 November 2025.

      Citation 2

    • 3,402

      LinkedIn Economic Graph

      Worldwide, undated live page.

      Citation 32

    • About 3,830

      Revelio Labs

      Worldwide, workforce data to March 2026.

      Citation 31

    Why it stays open: The values count different populations over overlapping periods, so the spread with its provenance is the finding, and no single headcount is published.

    The values count different objects or periods, so no range, sum or growth rate is derived across them.

    No value is averaged.

The shortage that shrank for the wrong reason

  • One publisher, revised

    European semiconductor skills gap to 2030

    What is counted: The unfilled European gap by 2030, as the same publisher stated it in two editions.

    • 75,400

      European Chips Skills Academy

      2024 edition.

      Citation 23

    • About 65,000

      European Chips Skills Academy

      2025 update.

      Citation 24

    Why it stays open: The gap narrowed because investment projects were withdrawn, not because supply improved, so the smaller figure is not better news.

    The earlier figure is kept beside the later one. A revision is a fact about the measurement, not a correction we may quietly absorb.

    No value is averaged.

Two thirds of the hires are below Bac+3: the qualification inversion in French nuclear

  • One publisher, revised

    French nuclear sector, core technical posts

    What is counted: Core highly technical posts counted by the sector body in two successive editions.

    • 163,000

      Société française d’énergie nucléaire (Revue Générale Nucléaire)

      End-2024 count, stated 28 October 2025.

      Citation 7

    • 125,000

      Société française d’énergie nucléaire (Revue Générale Nucléaire)

      First edition, early 2023.

      Citation 12

    Why it stays open: The perimeter changed between editions — the later count includes activity accessible in the United Kingdom — so no growth rate is derived across them.

    The earlier figure is kept beside the later one. A revision is a fact about the measurement, not a correction we may quietly absorb.

    No value is averaged.

Two clocks: what a semiconductor career near Bernin actually requires

  • Different objects counted

    Soitec, published revenue

    What is counted: Revenue as the company published it, for a full year and for a single quarter.

    • €592m

      Soitec

      FY2026, full year.

      Citation 2

    • €113m

      Soitec

      Q1 FY2027, one quarter.

      Citation 3

    Why it stays open: A quarter is not a year and nothing here is annualised: multiplying the quarter would manufacture a forecast the company has not given.

    The values count different objects or periods, so no range, sum or growth rate is derived across them.

    No value is averaged.

How this register is kept

  • Every value is printed as its publisher printed it. We do not round, convert currencies or restate units to make two figures look closer than they are.
  • Nothing here is averaged. A mid-point between two sourced figures is a number nobody published, and we do not publish numbers nobody published.
  • Each value names the citation index of the dossier that carries it, so you can open the source we read and check it yourself.
  • A disagreement leaves this register only when the published record itself resolves it. It is never quietly retired to make the page shorter.